Tested on a good day
One set of readings, taken when you were stable, standing in for a condition that varies week to week. Repeat testing and the surrounding records are the answer.
Cincinnati · Middletown · Hamilton · Dayton
Call us anytime, 24/7: 513-909-9999
These claims turn on a breathing test, which means they can be decided by what kind of day you were having when you took it.
No fee unless we win
Free consultation, no fee unless we win.
No fee unless we win
Respiratory claims work differently from everything else on this site. Where most conditions are argued through descriptions of function, these are measured. Spirometry produces numbers, and where the numbers are severe enough the claim can be allowed on that basis.
That sounds straightforward and it creates a specific vulnerability. A test is a snapshot. Take it on a good morning, after medication, sitting still in a quiet room, and it may not describe the person who cannot cross a parking lot in February without stopping.
A great many refused respiratory claims are refused on a single set of readings. When and how the test was performed is therefore worth as much attention as the result.
COPD, emphysema, chronic bronchitis, asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, bronchiectasis, sarcoidosis affecting the lungs, and chronic respiratory failure.
Where the test values fall short of a threshold, the claim is not over. It moves to the same functional analysis every other condition goes through, and respiratory conditions bring limitations that are easy to overlook.
Not whether you can lift a weight once, but whether you can carry it across a warehouse and still breathe. Breathlessness on exertion is a real restriction on almost all physical work and it is rarely captured by a lifting figure.
Somebody with three chest infections a winter, each taking two weeks, is unemployable regardless of how they test in June. Hospital and urgent care records are what establish this and they need to be gathered from every provider, not just the respiratory clinic.
Dust, fumes, temperature extremes and humidity. These restrictions eliminate whole categories of work, which is exactly the sort of finding that decides a claim at the vocational stage.
Three of these four are about the test rather than the illness.
One set of readings, taken when you were stable, standing in for a condition that varies week to week. Repeat testing and the surrounding records are the answer.
Effort-dependent tests can under-record or over-record. Whether the study met the technical standard is a legitimate and frequently decisive question.
Raised as failure to follow prescribed treatment. It is not automatically a bar, and it needs addressing directly rather than hoping it goes unmentioned.
As with spine claims, they find a desk job. Breathlessness at rest, oxygen use and environmental restrictions are what defeat that.
General information, not legal advice. Every case turns on its own facts. The only way to know where yours stands is to have someone look at it.
That happens often and it does not end the claim. Testing captures one moment, and a claim can still succeed on the functional evidence: exacerbation frequency, exertional tolerance, oxygen use and environmental restrictions. It does mean the rest of the record has to do more work.
Not automatically. It can be raised as a failure to follow prescribed treatment, and the response is evidence about whether stopping would restore your ability to work, which for advanced disease it frequently would not. It is better dealt with openly and early than left to surface at a hearing.
That is significant evidence. When it was prescribed, whether it is continuous or intermittent, and what happens without it all matter, so the prescribing records and any overnight or exertional studies are worth gathering.
Occupational lung disease may support a workers compensation claim alongside the disability claim, and the two are handled together here. Tell us what the exposure was and over what period.
That combination matters and the two should be presented together. Cardiac and respiratory limitations compound each other, and considered separately each can look manageable while the pair is disabling.
Our fees are set by federal statute, are contingency only, and are the lesser of 25% not to exceed the statutory maximum of $9,200.
There is nothing to pay up front and nothing to pay if the claim does not succeed. The fee comes out of past-due benefits when they are awarded, and it has to be approved.
The conditions we have written about are the ones we are asked about most often. They are not the only ones that qualify, and the list is not a test you have to appear on.
A disability claim is decided on what your conditions do to your ability to work, not on the name of the diagnosis. Several problems that are each manageable on their own can add up to something that is not, and that combination is frequently the strongest part of a claim.
If what you have is not on this site, that tells you nothing about your claim. Tell us what you have been diagnosed with and what it stops you doing, and we will tell you honestly whether it is worth pursuing.
The rest of this practice area, in case your situation fits one of them better.
One incident can open more than one claim, and they are handled together here.
I had been denied two times for social security after life changing damages to my back, ankle and knee, had paid into social security all my life and I'm 60 years old now. Steven Casper was compassionate and thorough and walked me through the process without any money to pay him he was able to get my social security approved and every dime of back pay for those two years I had waited and has assured me that if anything comes up he's there for me.
After I spent two years in a frustrating battle with the SSA, I finally contacted Casper, Casper, & Casper, and Robin took my disability case. In about six months, Robin had won my case, along with back pay. The whole process of working with this firm was pleasant and painless. The staff was quick to respond to my many questions and also to update my changing medical information.
If you have been denied disability benefits, I would DEFINITELY RECOMMEND this lawyers office!! Robin Partin and associates worked diligently on my case and fought for me! They were my voice and I won! 10/10
I really cannot say enough about my attorney Steven Casper and his work ethic and professionalism. Also his legal assistant Ben, these two did a lot of prep work and fielding my many emails and answering my questions. Steven Casper prepped me personally for my appeal and court with an administrative law judge. This process is very slow dealing with Social Security but he kept me informed every step of the way with great detail and it played out exactly as he had described.
I can't thank Casper, Casper and Casper enough for what they did for me. From start to finish it took less than a year for them to help me get disability benefits. They did almost all of the groundwork and made it as painless for me as possible. I would highly recommend them to anyone.
If I could give a MILLION PLUS stars I DEFINITELY would!! I contacted Mr. Steve Casper to handle my SSI case. I filed at first on my own and I was denied. He was VERY professional, honest and upfront about the clients he takes. He reassured me that I DID have a strong case. I got the news today that HE won my case for me!!!!
No cost, no obligation, and no fee unless we win.
Free consultation, no fee unless we win.
No fee unless we win