Assessed as a back claim
Lifting and standing get considered, hands do not. The refusal then reasons that sedentary work is available, which is exactly the work the condition prevents.
Cincinnati · Middletown · Hamilton · Dayton
Call us anytime, 24/7: 513-909-9999
A neck claim is decided on what your arms and hands can do, and on how long you can hold your head in one position.
No fee unless we win
Free consultation, no fee unless we win.
No fee unless we win
Cervical conditions get filed alongside lumbar ones and assessed as though they were the same thing, and they are not. A lower back claim is largely about lifting, standing and walking. A neck claim is largely about the arms and hands, and about position.
Cervical nerve root compression sends symptoms down the arm: weakness, numbness, dropping things, loss of fine control. Those are manipulative limitations, and they matter enormously, because the sedentary work an examiner falls back on when somebody cannot stand all day is precisely the work that requires constant use of the hands.
Somebody who cannot reach, handle or finger reliably cannot do sedentary work either, and that is the argument a properly built cervical claim makes.
Cervical disc herniation and degeneration, cervical stenosis, cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy, whiplash-associated disorder, failed cervical fusion, and cervicogenic headache.
Both are common and both are avoidable.
A file can contain a full cervical MRI report and nothing at all about grip strength, sensation in the fingers, or how long the claimant can keep their arms raised. Without that, the examiner has no basis to find manipulative limitation, and will assume there is none.
What helps: documented grip testing, sensory findings, any record of dropping objects or losing fine control, and a treating opinion that addresses use of the hands specifically.
Cervicogenic headaches are a genuine consequence of neck pathology and are among the most under-documented symptoms in these files. Frequency, duration, what stops them and what they prevent you doing are worth recording, because a headache two or three days a week is on its own an attendance problem no employer tolerates.
Different failure modes from a lumbar claim.
Lifting and standing get considered, hands do not. The refusal then reasons that sedentary work is available, which is exactly the work the condition prevents.
Symptoms down the arm without documented weakness, reflex change or sensory loss are read as subjective. Nerve conduction studies and careful examination findings answer this.
Mentioned to the doctor in passing and never written down. A simple frequency log kept over a few months is unglamorous and unusually persuasive.
Surgery is treated as the end of the story. Post-operative limitation, adjacent segment problems and continuing symptoms have to be documented after the fact.
General information, not legal advice. Every case turns on its own facts. The only way to know where yours stands is to have someone look at it.
In what it stops you doing. A lumbar claim is mostly about standing, walking and lifting. A cervical claim is mostly about your arms and hands, and about how long you can hold your head in one position. That difference decides which jobs remain available on paper, and it is the whole argument.
That is typical of cervical radiculopathy and it is worth making sure the record connects them. A file that documents hand symptoms without linking them to the cervical findings invites the conclusion that they are unrelated and therefore unexplained.
Initial improvement followed by deterioration is a common pattern and it needs documenting as a pattern. Where adjacent levels have since become symptomatic, the imaging and clinical findings that show it are important evidence.
Then there may be an injury claim as well as a disability claim, and the two are handled together here. What was recorded in the first days after the collision is often useful evidence in both.
That is valuable evidence. A failed attempt at accommodated work, documented by the employer, speaks directly to sustained functioning, which is the question the whole claim turns on.
Our fees are set by federal statute, are contingency only, and are the lesser of 25% not to exceed the statutory maximum of $9,200.
There is nothing to pay up front and nothing to pay if the claim does not succeed. The fee comes out of past-due benefits when they are awarded, and it has to be approved.
The conditions we have written about are the ones we are asked about most often. They are not the only ones that qualify, and the list is not a test you have to appear on.
A disability claim is decided on what your conditions do to your ability to work, not on the name of the diagnosis. Several problems that are each manageable on their own can add up to something that is not, and that combination is frequently the strongest part of a claim.
If what you have is not on this site, that tells you nothing about your claim. Tell us what you have been diagnosed with and what it stops you doing, and we will tell you honestly whether it is worth pursuing.
The rest of this practice area, in case your situation fits one of them better.
One incident can open more than one claim, and they are handled together here.
I highly recommend for anyone dealing with the disability process to contact Casper, Casper & Casper. Steve Casper along with Ben Hite were VERY helpful in the entire process. If I a had any questions or concerns; they had the answers and reassured me everything would be okay. They worked diligently on my case for months and I was FINALLY approved. This team of attorneys WILL help fight for you as they have for me.
I had been denied two times for social security after life changing damages to my back, ankle and knee, had paid into social security all my life and I'm 60 years old now. Steven Casper was compassionate and thorough and walked me through the process without any money to pay him he was able to get my social security approved and every dime of back pay for those two years I had waited and has assured me that if anything comes up he's there for me.
After I spent two years in a frustrating battle with the SSA, I finally contacted Casper, Casper, & Casper, and Robin took my disability case. In about six months, Robin had won my case, along with back pay. The whole process of working with this firm was pleasant and painless. The staff was quick to respond to my many questions and also to update my changing medical information.
If you have been denied disability benefits, I would DEFINITELY RECOMMEND this lawyers office!! Robin Partin and associates worked diligently on my case and fought for me! They were my voice and I won! 10/10
I really cannot say enough about my attorney Steven Casper and his work ethic and professionalism. Also his legal assistant Ben, these two did a lot of prep work and fielding my many emails and answering my questions. Steven Casper prepped me personally for my appeal and court with an administrative law judge. This process is very slow dealing with Social Security but he kept me informed every step of the way with great detail and it played out exactly as he had described.
I can't thank Casper, Casper and Casper enough for what they did for me. From start to finish it took less than a year for them to help me get disability benefits. They did almost all of the groundwork and made it as painless for me as possible. I would highly recommend them to anyone.
No cost, no obligation, and no fee unless we win.
Free consultation, no fee unless we win.
No fee unless we win