Doug Casper helped me with my Workman's Compensation claim, including a hearing before the Ohio Industrial Commission, in which he was successful. He was able to obtain total compensation for my hearing aids, which were desperately needed after a profession where I was continously over-exposed to very high decibel noise. Thank you Doug Casper!
Death Benefit Claims for Families
This claim is not the worker's. It belongs to the people who depended on them, and it does not require anybody to have been at fault.
No fee unless we win
Get a Casper to Help You Today
Free consultation, no fee unless we win.
No fee unless we win
What this is, in plain terms.
When somebody is killed at work, Ohio’s workers’ compensation system provides benefits to the people who depended on them. It is a separate claim from anything the worker had while they were alive, and the person bringing it is a member of the family rather than the worker.
Two things about it are worth knowing straight away. It does not require proving that anyone did anything wrong: the question is whether the death arose out of the work, not whether somebody was careless. And it is not the only claim that may exist, because where another party caused the death there can be a separate civil case alongside it.
Families are frequently told about one of these and not the other. If you are reading this shortly after a death, the only thing that needs doing now is finding out what exists. Nothing has to be decided today.
What this page covers
Deaths from a workplace accident, deaths from occupational disease, deaths following an earlier injury that had already been allowed, and claims where the cause is disputed.
- Brought by dependents Spouse, children, and sometimes others who relied on the income.
- No fault required The question is whether it arose out of the work.
- Separate from a civil claim Where somebody else caused it, both can exist.
- There are time limits Which is the one reason not to leave it indefinitely.
Two different claims, and a family may have both
They are often confused, including by people who should know better. The difference decides who can bring the claim and what has to be proved.
| What is being compared | A BWC death benefit claim Through the workers' compensation system | A wrongful death lawsuit A civil claim against whoever was responsible |
|---|---|---|
| What has to be proved | A BWC death benefit claim That the death arose out of and in the course of the employment. Fault is not part of it. | A wrongful death lawsuit That somebody else was at fault and that their fault caused the death. |
| Who it is against | A BWC death benefit claim The workers' compensation system. In most cases it is not a case against the employer as such. | A wrongful death lawsuit The person or company responsible, which in a work death is often a third party rather than the employer. |
| Who brings it | A BWC death benefit claim Dependents, on the basis that they relied on the worker. | A wrongful death lawsuit The estate, for the benefit of the family. A different test and sometimes different people. |
| A typical example | A BWC death benefit claim A driver killed in a collision while working has a death benefit claim regardless of who caused the crash. | A wrongful death lawsuit The same death may also support a civil claim against the other driver, which is a separate case entirely. |
| Why it matters now | A BWC death benefit claim and A wrongful death lawsuit Pursuing one can affect the other, and both have deadlines. That is the reason to find out what exists early, even if the family is not ready to do anything about it yet. | |
Who counts as a dependent, and the claims that get argued
The test in a death benefit claim is dependency: who relied on the worker’s income and to what extent. It is not the same as who is in the family, and it is not decided by the will.
A spouse and minor children are the clearest cases. Beyond that it becomes a question of fact, and it can include an adult child who could not support themselves, a parent who was being supported, or others living in the household. Where dependency is partial rather than total, that is recognized too and it is assessed differently.
Where these claims are disputed
Not usually over who the family is. Over whether the death arose out of the work, and three situations account for most of it.
The first is a death from natural causes at work, most often a cardiac event, where the argument is whether the work brought it on. The second is a death some time after an allowed injury, where the connection between the two has to be established and the employer will say the death had another cause. The third is an occupational disease death, which carries all the causation difficulty described on the occupational disease page and carries it without the person who worked there being able to explain anything.
What helps, if you are able
The employment records, the medical records including anything before the death, any accident report, and the names of people who worked alongside them. None of it has to be gathered by the family. We will tell you what is needed and obtain what we can ourselves.
Questions families ask
General information, not legal advice. Every case turns on its own facts. The only way to know where yours stands is to have someone look at it.
Do we have to prove somebody was at fault?
Not for the workers’ compensation death benefit. The question is whether the death arose out of the work. Fault becomes relevant only if there is also a civil claim against somebody else, which is a separate matter and one we would look at alongside this.
He died months after the injury at work.
That can still support a claim, and it is one of the situations where the connection has to be established with evidence rather than assumed. The existing claim file, the medical records and the cause of death all matter. It is worth asking about rather than concluding the gap in time rules it out.
Is a heart attack at work covered?
These claims are difficult and they are not hopeless. What matters is what was happening at the time and whether the work brought it on, which turns on the physical demands of that day and on medical opinion. They need evidence gathered early, which is the practical reason to ask sooner rather than later.
We are not ready to deal with any of this.
That is understood, and nothing about a first conversation commits you to anything. The only thing that genuinely cannot wait indefinitely is the time limit, so it is worth a short call to find out what applies, even if nothing is done for a while afterwards.
What does it cost us?
Nothing to ask, and nothing up front. We are paid only if the claim succeeds. If we do not think there is a claim here we will tell you that instead of taking it on.
The appeal deadlines
Ohio workers compensation runs on short deadlines, and they are the reason most appeals are lost rather than the merits.
An order of the Bureau is appealed to the Industrial Commission within 14 days. An order of a District Hearing Officer is appealed to a Staff Hearing Officer within 14 days. An order of a Staff Hearing Officer is appealed to the full Industrial Commission within 14 days.
Where the dispute is about your right to participate in the fund at all, there is a further appeal to the Court of Common Pleas, and that one runs for 60 days.
A dispute about the extent of your disability does not go to the common pleas court. That is challenged only through a mandamus action, which is a different proceeding on a different standard. It is one of the most common misunderstandings we see, and it costs people appeals.
Other Workers' Compensation pages
The rest of this practice area, in case your situation fits one of them better.
The three areas we handle
One incident can open more than one claim, and they are handled together here.
What our clients say
Joni Hayes the best the lady saved Christmas. She was on top of this self insured employer of mine that dint wanna pay up was two months. when I hired them she fixed the problem in couple hours and was holiday season wow she was amazing I totally recommend
I have Doug Casper for my workers comp. He has helped me tremendously. I am now also working with Steve for my disability. Steve also helped us so so much when my late husband needed help with his illness. I have recommended this group to anyone who would need a lawyer.
I had great service from Casper & Casper and I recommend them to all my family and friends for their Workers Compensation needs.
Casper and Casper has taken care of my family for years my dad was hurt really bad and handicapped the rest of his life they helped him getting everything he needed and now that i was hurt on the job they have taken care of me
I was injured on the job a while ago, and my employer decided that instead of taking care of me, they would let me go, even though I reported the injury. I contacted Dan Allnutt, of Casper, Casper & Casper, and told him my problem. He and his team went to work and got me the surgery i needed, and the workman's compensation I was due to get back to where I am today. Kim Chupka was an incredible rock, and every time I had a complaint or question, she was always there, with an answer.
Tell us what happened.
No cost, no obligation, and no fee unless we win.
Get a Casper to Help You Today
Free consultation, no fee unless we win.
No fee unless we win